Posts Tagged: qualitative research


Posts Tagged ‘qualitative research’

Sep 08 2010

Response – Post 1

Published by

Below are the original framing questions I posted for Week 1 and my responses after today’s discussion.

1. Although quantitative research methods are the most popular when it comes to gathering and analyzing data, there are many benefits to the qualitative approach as well. As a researcher, which method appeals to you most and why? Is there one particular aspect/component you find compelling?

As a researcher the qualitative method appeals to me the most. While I appreciate hard data and numbers to help support qualitative analysis, I feel that tools like observation and interviews give research a certain warmth and make it more relatable. I also feel that it gives research an opportunity to explore the “human” side of an issue rather than just base it on numbers. Qualitative methods also allows for flexibility and exploratory research, which can be beneficial when first tackling a new issue. The component I find most compelling within qualitative research is the interview aspect, or using other people’s experience and knowledge to help shape the results. The interview process (and the flexibility of this kind of research) allows the researcher to ask follow up questions or go in-depth about certain aspects in regards to whatever issue is currently being studied. While I prefer qualitative methods, I do believe that both methods are needed in order to understand communication theories in today’s society.

2. In chapter 13 the authors assign certain theories to communication professions demonstrating real-world use of theory. Pick one of the industry-related fields and decide if you agree with the authors suggestions. For example, do you agree that in Public Relations the theory of framing and agenda setting would be useful/applicable? Why or why not? If possible try to tie in work/internship/classroom experiences that help demonstrate this.

Having worked in PR for two years I can see how I used the framing and agenda setting theories in my everyday work experiences. The way I would word or frame press releases, pitches and media materials was based on what I thought would grab the media’s attention and thus result in a story being written. For example, one client I worked for was an auto insurance company and we developed an annual campaign for them testing driver’s knowledge based on if they would pass a standard DMV test today. Based on the findings we would frame headlines to read XX Insurance Company Finds  Americans May Be Unfit for Roads*. With this headline we wanted to convey that our survey results indicated that many would not pass the DMV test, however because it was not a “scientific” study (more entertainment based) we had to be careful about phrasing, which is way we used “may be unfit.”  By keeping the wording vague we were able to avoid backlash from those who would measure it by scientific standards and challenge the methodology. What’s interesting is that while I was using the theory to help launch the campaign and make it successful,  at the same time I was completely unaware that I was doing it – it felt natural and almost obvious. I think this is a great example of how we use theory in our daily lives and that it’s become an ingrained part of our thinking process.

3. This last question doesn’t directly involve the reading, but as I’m interested in using interviews as part of my research paper I thought it would be beneficial to discuss. The authors suggest that interviews are a strong qualitative measurement when it comes to communications research and theory. What is the best way (email, phone?) to secure an interview with a source who the researcher may not know? How can researchers frame their idea in such a way that will excite a prospective interviewee into participating?

While we didn’t discuss this in class, I believe the best way to start a “cold” conversation is to first research the person you want to interview and see if there are any commonalities. Did you both go to school in the city? Does he/she have a masters in Interactive Media? I would then compose a brief email with using this information and also about my research project. I’d request to have no more than 15 to 20 minutes of their time and give them all my contact information. Depending on the source, if I hadn’t heard back I might try a follow up call, but again this would depend on the source and on the research topic. To help engage the source in my research I would talk about the importance of their expertise and also how their work has influenced this topic (it’s a little brown nosing, but it never hurts, right?) I’d also explain why I think their contribution would be valuable. However, if the source isn’t interested I would move onto a new potential source and continue until I found someone who would be able to fit my research purposes and provide useful insight to my topic.

* I omitted the client’s name for privacy reasons (should someone stumble across this blog).

Sep 06 2010

Framing Questions – Wk 1

Published by

1.  How will understanding theory and the study of mass communication help me as an interactive designer?

2.  Throughout the semester, as we read studies and research others have done, how can I train myself to be analytical of the research?  Most of these studies will be looking at human behavior, which is  difficult to make sense of.  How do I learn to judge a study as valid or flawed?

3.  Qualitative versus quantitative.  In a broad sense, I understand these two terms.  But I want to know specifics.  What are the common research methods in both categories?  When should one be used instead of the other?  Does one carry more weight/significance than the other?  Can the two methods be married for a better understanding of the subject?

Sep 05 2010

Framing Questions– R&V Ch 1-3, 13

Published by

1. The book quotes Wimmer and Dominick’s idea of interpretive research as saying the purpose of interpretive research is “to understand how people in everyday natural settings create meanings and interpret the events of the world.”  How can this be applied to a practical way of doing research on social media such as Facebook and Twitter when the “natural setting” is a virtual community as opposed to a community that converses in the real world?

2. When observing a certain group of people it is important to have controls so that you are testing the affect of only one variable.  The book gives an example of studying students texting in class and how it affects their comprehension and retention of information.  There will almost always be something else that could distract a student besides texting such as a test in the next class.  Besides having a large sample size, how can a researcher be sure that their human subjects are indeed only being affected by your variable and not outside forces?

3. How can the knowledge of mass communication theories benefit a professional?  What would be the effects to the job performance of one who is educated in the theories as opposed to one who is only educated in the practical application of the job?

Sep 04 2010

Week 1 Framing Questions

Published by

1)  Since social scientists haven’t figured out how to adequately measure human behavior, how do companies like Twitter and facebook–who rely so heavily on behavior–even begin to brainstorm methods to advance their products?

2) Does quantitative research via surveys only reach a certain demographic? Unless there’s honorarium involved, I’d think there’s only a handful of personality types that actually participate in surveys (these are the same people who collect your newspapers for you when you go out of town).

3) Some industries value quantitative research over qualitative research any day of the week, and vice-versa. How are we as researchers supposed to know what our audience will hold in higher regard…qualitative or quantitative research?