Category Archives: Assignment 9

The Corporate Humanitarian

Big-Box Retailers Targeted By Chicago Ordinance

The most basic definition of a humanitarian is “…pertaining to the saving of human lives or to the alleviation of suffering…a person actively engaged in promoting human welfare and social reforms, as a philanthropist” (“Humanitarian”). Some people would define humanitarianism with a Dunantist view, saying that we need to have impartiality. Which I certainly agree with when analyzing the problems in an area, but this impartiality can also be problematic as we saw discussed in War Games, where many of the refugee camps in Goma simply refueled armies through their refugee soldiers. I personally associate my definition of a humanitarian not only with the quote above, but I also found the Oxfam “Be Humankind” ad to be helpful in defining this because we as all humans (so we all can be humanitarians) need to speak out against the injustices, and others will follow suit. When I think of any humanitarian definition though, I think of a person working in war zones and crisis areas and doing their best not only to support the victims, but to change the area for the better and prevent future crisis from happening. But when you read this definition, could you apply it to a corporation? Perhaps in America we would be more inclined to say yes, since capitalism thrives off of the consumerism that these corporations provide. Sure, corporations are run by humans who can have these good intentions, but is the main goal really to alleviate suffering?

Similar to the MONGOS that Polman discusses in War Games, new ways of trying to facilitate humanitarian aid arise and they all believe that their idea is better than the last and many donate their money toward these causes, causing the humanitarian aid industry to boom. In order to compete and earn the most money to provide aid, businesses have adopted neoliberism tactics: “One crucial element of this doctrine is the idea that where private capital can provide public and nonprofit services more efficiently it should be allowed to do so. The entry of firms, and the logic of business, into the area of humanitarianism is the result” (Hopgood 99). The money of donators is how humanitarian aid organizations thrive, and pairing up with a corporation can get them even more money. In Polman’s book this focus on money rather than providing aid is condemned, but this shift that has occurred in the humanitarian aid industry would be difficult to be rid of, especially because consumers/donators are tied into the mix.

As I discussed in my individual research, this cause-related marketing (where corporate entities donate portions of their profit to charity) is definitely appealing to consumers, even if it is not doing much for the actual humanitarian organizations. Corporations use cause-related marketing to gain more profit for themselves rather than primarily focusing in on the main idea of a humanitarian to “alleviate suffering”. According to Nan and Heo’s research, over 85% of organization’s corporate members are using cause-related marketing strategies (Nan and Heo 63). Not only is this being widely used as a profit-gaining strategy by corporations, but consumers actually have been shown to pay up to 6% more for charitable causes and also favor certain retailers and brands if they support a good cause (Elfenbein and McManus 28-29). Those trying to provide aid simply by purchasing things for themselves need to focus on who is really profiting from strategies like this–the people in need or aid or corporations?

I believe that corporations are only taking a humanitarian stand because of the profits they see. Although they gain all of this money that they can use for humanitarian acts, most of it goes straight into their pockets instead of into aid. Hopgood even says: “Wal-Mart is about turning money into more money; and it is not inherently to one kind of service for only one, invariant, “consumer”” (Hopgood 102). If Wal-Mart were to provide aid to an area of crisis, surely they would have workers wearing Wal-Mart gear and make this seen publicly by the media in order to attract more consumers who would appreciate the work they are doing. Wal-Mart has already put many American corporations and small businesses out of business with its exports, why would it stop there?

I do not think that humanitarian organizations should team up with these corporations, especially Wal-Mart because they do not share the same common goal. Humanitarianism is more than just meeting the needs of victims, and according to Hopgood: “Wal-Mart’s metric for “customer satisfaction” cannot accommodate such costly and qualitative criteria. It can only provide the basics–water, food, medicine, shelter” and surely these things are needed but can already be purchased by the amount donated without corporation’s help (Hopgood 113).

Here is a link to a movie about the high cost of Wal-Mart: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jazb24Q2s94 

 

 

Works Cited:

Elfenbein, Daniel W., and Brian McManus. “A Greater Price for a Greater Good? Evidence That Consumers Pay More for Charity-Linked Products.” JSTOR. American Economic Association, May 2010. Web. 24 June 2013.

Hopgood, Stephen. “Saying “No” to Wal-Mart?: Money and Mortality in Professional Humanitarianism.” N.p., n.d. Web. 24 June 2013. <http://graduateinstitute.ch/webdav/site/political_science/shared/political_science/3205/Hopgood-Saying%20No%20to%20Wal-Mart.pdf>.

“Humanitarian.” Dictionary.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 June 2013. <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/humanitarian>.

Nan, Xiaoli, and Kwangjun Heo. “Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives: Examining the Role of Brand-Cause Fit in Cause-Related Marketing.” JSTOR. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2007. Web. 17 June 2013.

Polman, Linda. War Games. London: Penguin, 2010. Print.

Comments Off on The Corporate Humanitarian

A9 Wal-Mart as a humanitarian global citizen? Due June 25th

Wal-Mart as a humanitarian global citizen?

In his book chapter entitled “Saying ‘No’ to Wal-Mart?  Money and Morality in professional humanitarianism” Stephen Hopgood (in Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics edited by Michael Barnett and Thomas Weiss [2008]) points out that there has been a profound shift in the landscape of humanitarianism in the last two and a half decades.  What was once the Humanitarianism in questionprovince of independent humanitarian entities like Oxfam (established in the 1942) and Medecins San Frontieres (established 1971) and INGO’s (International Non-Governmental Organizations) like UNICEF is now populated by an exponentially rising number of corporations.  Many -if not most- large multinational corporations now have CSR (corporate social responsibility) and/or philanthropic departments whose purpose is to channel corporate funds to what are deemed appropriate causes.  The Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy was established in 1999 by actor Paul Newman and is one example of this movement.

Given what you have learned about humanitarian outreach from Linda Polman in the Crisis Caravan, what do you make of this rising movement of corporate “humanitarians?”  After reading the Hopgood article, what is your response to the question, “Can Wal-Mart be a humanitarian?”  Should more traditional humanitarian entities partner with corporations for the collective good?  What are other questions to be considered before answering both of these  tough questions? For example, what is neoliberalism?  What does it mean to follow “Dunantist” principles?  What, at the end of the day, is a humanitarian?

Rubric:

  • Due by 10:00pm EST June 25th.
  • Late posts will be downgraded at least one letter grade.
  • Comments to at least two colleague’s posts by  June 26th by 10:00PM EST.
  • At least three citations: at least one from text and/or other assigned reading, and at least two from outside academic sources.  Note:  you are to read/watch/listen to all of the material in the hyperlinks in the parent post above; your contact with the material should be apparent in your post.
  • List references at the bottom of the page (MLA format).
  • At least one photo and/or video link.
  • Minimum 0f 500 words (excluding references).
  • Grade will be based on quality and quantity of response to the post prompt including adherence to the above benchmarks.
  • Keep in mind that you are writing for a broad audience that is educated and interested in this topic; infuse your post with the sociology you are learning/have learned in a non-jargonistic manner

Please check Assignments/Assignment 9 before you Publish.

Also posted in Assignments | Comments Off on A9 Wal-Mart as a humanitarian global citizen? Due June 25th